Review



rabbit anti rab11  (Cell Signaling Technology Inc)


Bioz Verified Symbol Cell Signaling Technology Inc is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol Cell Signaling Technology Inc manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 95

    Structured Review

    Cell Signaling Technology Inc rabbit anti rab11
    Rabbit Anti Rab11, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 68 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/rabbit+anti+mouse+rab11/bio_rxiv__64898__2026__03__22__713512-167-63-66?v=Cell+Signaling+Technology+Inc
    Average 95 stars, based on 68 article reviews
    rabbit anti rab11 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    95/100 stars

    Images



    Similar Products

    95
    Cell Signaling Technology Inc rabbit anti rab11
    Rabbit Anti Rab11, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/rabbit+anti+mouse+rab11/bio_rxiv__64898__2026__03__22__713512-167-63-66?v=Cell+Signaling+Technology+Inc
    Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    rabbit anti rab11 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    95/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    96
    Cell Signaling Technology Inc rabbit anti mouse rab11
    Rabbit Anti Mouse Rab11, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/rabbit+anti+mouse+rab11/pmc12164027-6-0-4?v=Cell+Signaling+Technology+Inc
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    rabbit anti mouse rab11 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    95
    Cell Signaling Technology Inc mouse anti rab11 gtp
    Mouse Anti Rab11 Gtp, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/rabbit+anti+mouse+rab11/pmc06962367-158-80-77?v=Cell+Signaling+Technology+Inc
    Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    mouse anti rab11 gtp - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    95/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    96
    Cell Signaling Technology Inc anti rab11 mouse monoclonal antibody
    Late Endocytic Mediators of GRP78 and DMP1 Internalization. hPDLSCs were subjected to osteogenic differentiation or control media for 2 days prior to treatment with rDMP1. Both groups were grown to 70–80% confluency and serum starved for 4 h prior to treatment with rDMP1. (A) Representative confocal images showing localization of Rab7 (FITC-Green) and GRP78 (TRITC Red). (B) Localization of <t>Rab11</t> (FITC-Green) and GRP78 (TRITC Red). Images were acquired with a Zeiss Meta 710 Confocal Microscope. Arrows denote areas of colocalization between GRP78 and Rab7 or 11. Scale bar = 10 μm.
    Anti Rab11 Mouse Monoclonal Antibody, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/rabbit+anti+mouse+rab11/pmc06751249-44-51-56?v=Cell+Signaling+Technology+Inc
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    anti rab11 mouse monoclonal antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    92
    Cell Signaling Technology Inc α mouse rab11
    (A) Immunofluorescence staining of Treg cells from miR-181a/b-1 +/− or miR-181a/b-1 −/− mice with antibodies against Foxp3 and CTLA-4. Right panel, quantification of integrated density for CTLA-4 fluorescence normalized to the area of each individual cell. Data are representative of 3 independent experiments with n = 3 for each genotype (pooled). Data were analyzed using ImageJ software. DAPI, nuclear staining. Scale bar, 2 μm. (B) Immunofluorescence staining of CD4 + T cells from miR-181a/b-1 +/− or miR-181a/b-1 −/− mice with antibodies against murine CTLA-4, EEA1 (upper panel) and GM130 (lower panel). Data are representative of 3 independent experiments with n = 3 (pool). Right panels show colocalization scatter plots. (C) Immunofluorescence staining of CD4 + T cells from miR-181a/b-1 +/− or miR-181a/b-1 −/− mice with antibodies against murine CTLA-4, <t>Rab11</t> (upper panel) and LAMP2 (lower panel). Data are representative of 3 independent experiments with n = 3 (pool). Right panels show colocalization scatter plots. Data were analyzed using ImageJ software. DAPI, nuclear staining. Scale bar, 2 μm. (D) Enhanced degradation of CTLA-4 in the absence of miR-181a/b-1. CD4 + T cells isolated from spls and subcutaneous LNs of miR-181a/b-1 +/− or miR-181a/b-1 −/− mice were stimulated for 2 h with αCD3/αCD28 antibodies. In order to monitor protein degradation, CHX was added and incubated with cells for an additional 3 h. Each dot represents an individual cell from 10–12 randomly chosen fields of view. Quantification of integrated density for CTLA-4 fluorescence per cell was quantified using ImageJ software. (E) CD4 + CD25 + -enriched T cells were incubated in the presence of an inhibitor of lysosomal degradation, bafilomycin, for indicated time points. Accumulation of CTLA-4 was detected using FACS, and fold increase of MFI was calculated using time point 0 as reference. Data from 3 independent experiments, n = 3. (F) Cell-intrinsic up-regulation of CTLA-4 in the absence of miR-181a/b-1. Mixed BM chimeras were generated by mixing BM cells from miR-181a/b-1 +/− (CD45.1) and miR-181a/b-1 −/− (CD45.2) mice in a 1:1 ratio and injecting them into lethally irradiated WT recipients (CD45.1/2). Chimeras were analyzed 8 weeks after reconstitution for CTLA-4 expression in TCRβ + CD4 + Foxp3 + cells from the Thy, spl, and LNs. Plots are representative of 2 independent experiments with n = 9 per experiment. Each set of paired data points represents an individual mouse. (G) RNA flow-cytometry analysis of the expression of Nr4a1 by TCRβ + CD4 + Foxp3 + Treg cells from pooled spl and LNs. Numbers indicate average MFI ± SD. Data from 2 independent experiments with n = 2–3 per experiment. Statistical analysis was performed using unpaired Student’s t test (A), two-way ANOVA (E, p -values for effect of genotype, ** p = 0.0021) and paired Student’s t test (F, p -values for effect of each genotype, ** p = 0.0021, *** p = 0.0002, and **** p < 0.0001). Numerical values are available in . AU, arbitrary unit; BM, bone marrow; CD, cluster of differentiation; CHX, cycloheximide; CTLA-4, cytotoxic T-lymphocyte–associated protein 4; EEA1, early endosome antigen 1; FACS, fluorescence-activated cell scan; Foxp3, forkhead box protein P3; GM130, cis -Golgi matrix protein 130; LAMP2, lysosome-associated membrane protein 2; LN, lymph node; MFI, mean fluorescence intensity; miR-181, microRNA-181; Nr4a , Nuclear receptor subfamily 4 group A; Rab11, Ras-related in brain protein 11; spl, spleen; TCR, T-cell receptor; Thy, thymus; Treg cell, regulatory T cell; WT, wild type.
    α Mouse Rab11, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 92/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/rabbit+anti+mouse+rab11/pmc06428341-260-49-52?v=Cell+Signaling+Technology+Inc
    Average 92 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    α mouse rab11 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    92/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    96
    Cell Signaling Technology Inc mouse anti rab 11
    (A) Immunofluorescence staining of Treg cells from miR-181a/b-1 +/− or miR-181a/b-1 −/− mice with antibodies against Foxp3 and CTLA-4. Right panel, quantification of integrated density for CTLA-4 fluorescence normalized to the area of each individual cell. Data are representative of 3 independent experiments with n = 3 for each genotype (pooled). Data were analyzed using ImageJ software. DAPI, nuclear staining. Scale bar, 2 μm. (B) Immunofluorescence staining of CD4 + T cells from miR-181a/b-1 +/− or miR-181a/b-1 −/− mice with antibodies against murine CTLA-4, EEA1 (upper panel) and GM130 (lower panel). Data are representative of 3 independent experiments with n = 3 (pool). Right panels show colocalization scatter plots. (C) Immunofluorescence staining of CD4 + T cells from miR-181a/b-1 +/− or miR-181a/b-1 −/− mice with antibodies against murine CTLA-4, <t>Rab11</t> (upper panel) and LAMP2 (lower panel). Data are representative of 3 independent experiments with n = 3 (pool). Right panels show colocalization scatter plots. Data were analyzed using ImageJ software. DAPI, nuclear staining. Scale bar, 2 μm. (D) Enhanced degradation of CTLA-4 in the absence of miR-181a/b-1. CD4 + T cells isolated from spls and subcutaneous LNs of miR-181a/b-1 +/− or miR-181a/b-1 −/− mice were stimulated for 2 h with αCD3/αCD28 antibodies. In order to monitor protein degradation, CHX was added and incubated with cells for an additional 3 h. Each dot represents an individual cell from 10–12 randomly chosen fields of view. Quantification of integrated density for CTLA-4 fluorescence per cell was quantified using ImageJ software. (E) CD4 + CD25 + -enriched T cells were incubated in the presence of an inhibitor of lysosomal degradation, bafilomycin, for indicated time points. Accumulation of CTLA-4 was detected using FACS, and fold increase of MFI was calculated using time point 0 as reference. Data from 3 independent experiments, n = 3. (F) Cell-intrinsic up-regulation of CTLA-4 in the absence of miR-181a/b-1. Mixed BM chimeras were generated by mixing BM cells from miR-181a/b-1 +/− (CD45.1) and miR-181a/b-1 −/− (CD45.2) mice in a 1:1 ratio and injecting them into lethally irradiated WT recipients (CD45.1/2). Chimeras were analyzed 8 weeks after reconstitution for CTLA-4 expression in TCRβ + CD4 + Foxp3 + cells from the Thy, spl, and LNs. Plots are representative of 2 independent experiments with n = 9 per experiment. Each set of paired data points represents an individual mouse. (G) RNA flow-cytometry analysis of the expression of Nr4a1 by TCRβ + CD4 + Foxp3 + Treg cells from pooled spl and LNs. Numbers indicate average MFI ± SD. Data from 2 independent experiments with n = 2–3 per experiment. Statistical analysis was performed using unpaired Student’s t test (A), two-way ANOVA (E, p -values for effect of genotype, ** p = 0.0021) and paired Student’s t test (F, p -values for effect of each genotype, ** p = 0.0021, *** p = 0.0002, and **** p < 0.0001). Numerical values are available in . AU, arbitrary unit; BM, bone marrow; CD, cluster of differentiation; CHX, cycloheximide; CTLA-4, cytotoxic T-lymphocyte–associated protein 4; EEA1, early endosome antigen 1; FACS, fluorescence-activated cell scan; Foxp3, forkhead box protein P3; GM130, cis -Golgi matrix protein 130; LAMP2, lysosome-associated membrane protein 2; LN, lymph node; MFI, mean fluorescence intensity; miR-181, microRNA-181; Nr4a , Nuclear receptor subfamily 4 group A; Rab11, Ras-related in brain protein 11; spl, spleen; TCR, T-cell receptor; Thy, thymus; Treg cell, regulatory T cell; WT, wild type.
    Mouse Anti Rab 11, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/rabbit+anti+mouse+rab11/bio_rxiv__363721-73-68-72?v=Cell+Signaling+Technology+Inc
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    mouse anti rab 11 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Late Endocytic Mediators of GRP78 and DMP1 Internalization. hPDLSCs were subjected to osteogenic differentiation or control media for 2 days prior to treatment with rDMP1. Both groups were grown to 70–80% confluency and serum starved for 4 h prior to treatment with rDMP1. (A) Representative confocal images showing localization of Rab7 (FITC-Green) and GRP78 (TRITC Red). (B) Localization of Rab11 (FITC-Green) and GRP78 (TRITC Red). Images were acquired with a Zeiss Meta 710 Confocal Microscope. Arrows denote areas of colocalization between GRP78 and Rab7 or 11. Scale bar = 10 μm.

    Journal: Frontiers in Physiology

    Article Title: Endocytic Trafficking of DMP1 and GRP78 Complex Facilitates Osteogenic Differentiation of Human Periodontal Ligament Stem Cells

    doi: 10.3389/fphys.2019.01175

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Late Endocytic Mediators of GRP78 and DMP1 Internalization. hPDLSCs were subjected to osteogenic differentiation or control media for 2 days prior to treatment with rDMP1. Both groups were grown to 70–80% confluency and serum starved for 4 h prior to treatment with rDMP1. (A) Representative confocal images showing localization of Rab7 (FITC-Green) and GRP78 (TRITC Red). (B) Localization of Rab11 (FITC-Green) and GRP78 (TRITC Red). Images were acquired with a Zeiss Meta 710 Confocal Microscope. Arrows denote areas of colocalization between GRP78 and Rab7 or 11. Scale bar = 10 μm.

    Article Snippet: The sections were probed with anti-Rab5 rabbit polyclonal or anti-Rab5 mouse monoclonal antibody (1/100; Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA or 1/100; Santa-Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX, United States), anti-Rab7 rabbit polyclonal or anti-Rab7 mouse monoclonal antibody (1/100; Cell Signaling Technology or 1/100; Santa-Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX, United States), anti-Rab11 rabbit polyclonal or anti-Rab11 mouse monoclonal antibody (1/100; Cell Signaling Technology or 1/100 Santa-Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX), anti- GRP78 mouse monoclonal (1/400; Santa-Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX or 1/400; made in house), anti-DMP1 rabbit polyclonal antibody (1/100; made in house), and anti-STRO-1 mouse monoclonal antibody (Abcam, Cambridge, United Kingdom) in the various experiments.

    Techniques: Control, Microscopy

    Localization of GRP78, DMP1 and the endocytic mediators in the periodontal ligament of mouse mandible. (A) Localization of Rab5, (FITC-Green) with DMP1 or GRP78 (TRITC-Red) in the periodontal ligament of one-month post-natal wild-type mice. (B) Localization of Rab7 (FITC Green) with DMP1 or GRP78 (TRITC-Red) in the periodontal ligament of one-month post-natal wild-type mice. (C) Localization of Rab11, (FITC-Green) with DMP1 or GRP78 (TRITC-Red) in the periodontal ligament of one-month post-natal wild-type mice. In panels (A–C) co-expression of two-proteins is indicated by yellow and DAPI is blue. Images were acquired with a Zeiss Meta 710 Confocal Microscope. In which panel the individual channels are shown along with the merged image. PDL, periodontal ligament, B, Bone. Scale bar = 10 μm.

    Journal: Frontiers in Physiology

    Article Title: Endocytic Trafficking of DMP1 and GRP78 Complex Facilitates Osteogenic Differentiation of Human Periodontal Ligament Stem Cells

    doi: 10.3389/fphys.2019.01175

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Localization of GRP78, DMP1 and the endocytic mediators in the periodontal ligament of mouse mandible. (A) Localization of Rab5, (FITC-Green) with DMP1 or GRP78 (TRITC-Red) in the periodontal ligament of one-month post-natal wild-type mice. (B) Localization of Rab7 (FITC Green) with DMP1 or GRP78 (TRITC-Red) in the periodontal ligament of one-month post-natal wild-type mice. (C) Localization of Rab11, (FITC-Green) with DMP1 or GRP78 (TRITC-Red) in the periodontal ligament of one-month post-natal wild-type mice. In panels (A–C) co-expression of two-proteins is indicated by yellow and DAPI is blue. Images were acquired with a Zeiss Meta 710 Confocal Microscope. In which panel the individual channels are shown along with the merged image. PDL, periodontal ligament, B, Bone. Scale bar = 10 μm.

    Article Snippet: The sections were probed with anti-Rab5 rabbit polyclonal or anti-Rab5 mouse monoclonal antibody (1/100; Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA or 1/100; Santa-Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX, United States), anti-Rab7 rabbit polyclonal or anti-Rab7 mouse monoclonal antibody (1/100; Cell Signaling Technology or 1/100; Santa-Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX, United States), anti-Rab11 rabbit polyclonal or anti-Rab11 mouse monoclonal antibody (1/100; Cell Signaling Technology or 1/100 Santa-Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX), anti- GRP78 mouse monoclonal (1/400; Santa-Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX or 1/400; made in house), anti-DMP1 rabbit polyclonal antibody (1/100; made in house), and anti-STRO-1 mouse monoclonal antibody (Abcam, Cambridge, United Kingdom) in the various experiments.

    Techniques: Expressing, Microscopy

    Hypothetical Model of the vesicular trafficking of DMP1-GRP78 during endocytosis. The model shows that under stress conditions or a mineralization stimulus, GRP78 translocates from the ER to the plasma membrane to act a receptor for DMP1. The DMP1-GRP78 complex translocates intracellularly and moves from the early endosome to the late endosome with the help of Rabs 5 and 7, respectively, and recycling of GRP78 by Rab11. Nuclear translocation of DMP1 from the cytoplasm could be facilitated by importin alpha. In the nucleus, DMP1 can help with the transcription of genes responsible for osteoblast/odontoblast differentiation.

    Journal: Frontiers in Physiology

    Article Title: Endocytic Trafficking of DMP1 and GRP78 Complex Facilitates Osteogenic Differentiation of Human Periodontal Ligament Stem Cells

    doi: 10.3389/fphys.2019.01175

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Hypothetical Model of the vesicular trafficking of DMP1-GRP78 during endocytosis. The model shows that under stress conditions or a mineralization stimulus, GRP78 translocates from the ER to the plasma membrane to act a receptor for DMP1. The DMP1-GRP78 complex translocates intracellularly and moves from the early endosome to the late endosome with the help of Rabs 5 and 7, respectively, and recycling of GRP78 by Rab11. Nuclear translocation of DMP1 from the cytoplasm could be facilitated by importin alpha. In the nucleus, DMP1 can help with the transcription of genes responsible for osteoblast/odontoblast differentiation.

    Article Snippet: The sections were probed with anti-Rab5 rabbit polyclonal or anti-Rab5 mouse monoclonal antibody (1/100; Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA or 1/100; Santa-Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX, United States), anti-Rab7 rabbit polyclonal or anti-Rab7 mouse monoclonal antibody (1/100; Cell Signaling Technology or 1/100; Santa-Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX, United States), anti-Rab11 rabbit polyclonal or anti-Rab11 mouse monoclonal antibody (1/100; Cell Signaling Technology or 1/100 Santa-Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX), anti- GRP78 mouse monoclonal (1/400; Santa-Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX or 1/400; made in house), anti-DMP1 rabbit polyclonal antibody (1/100; made in house), and anti-STRO-1 mouse monoclonal antibody (Abcam, Cambridge, United Kingdom) in the various experiments.

    Techniques: Clinical Proteomics, Membrane, Translocation Assay

    (A) Immunofluorescence staining of Treg cells from miR-181a/b-1 +/− or miR-181a/b-1 −/− mice with antibodies against Foxp3 and CTLA-4. Right panel, quantification of integrated density for CTLA-4 fluorescence normalized to the area of each individual cell. Data are representative of 3 independent experiments with n = 3 for each genotype (pooled). Data were analyzed using ImageJ software. DAPI, nuclear staining. Scale bar, 2 μm. (B) Immunofluorescence staining of CD4 + T cells from miR-181a/b-1 +/− or miR-181a/b-1 −/− mice with antibodies against murine CTLA-4, EEA1 (upper panel) and GM130 (lower panel). Data are representative of 3 independent experiments with n = 3 (pool). Right panels show colocalization scatter plots. (C) Immunofluorescence staining of CD4 + T cells from miR-181a/b-1 +/− or miR-181a/b-1 −/− mice with antibodies against murine CTLA-4, Rab11 (upper panel) and LAMP2 (lower panel). Data are representative of 3 independent experiments with n = 3 (pool). Right panels show colocalization scatter plots. Data were analyzed using ImageJ software. DAPI, nuclear staining. Scale bar, 2 μm. (D) Enhanced degradation of CTLA-4 in the absence of miR-181a/b-1. CD4 + T cells isolated from spls and subcutaneous LNs of miR-181a/b-1 +/− or miR-181a/b-1 −/− mice were stimulated for 2 h with αCD3/αCD28 antibodies. In order to monitor protein degradation, CHX was added and incubated with cells for an additional 3 h. Each dot represents an individual cell from 10–12 randomly chosen fields of view. Quantification of integrated density for CTLA-4 fluorescence per cell was quantified using ImageJ software. (E) CD4 + CD25 + -enriched T cells were incubated in the presence of an inhibitor of lysosomal degradation, bafilomycin, for indicated time points. Accumulation of CTLA-4 was detected using FACS, and fold increase of MFI was calculated using time point 0 as reference. Data from 3 independent experiments, n = 3. (F) Cell-intrinsic up-regulation of CTLA-4 in the absence of miR-181a/b-1. Mixed BM chimeras were generated by mixing BM cells from miR-181a/b-1 +/− (CD45.1) and miR-181a/b-1 −/− (CD45.2) mice in a 1:1 ratio and injecting them into lethally irradiated WT recipients (CD45.1/2). Chimeras were analyzed 8 weeks after reconstitution for CTLA-4 expression in TCRβ + CD4 + Foxp3 + cells from the Thy, spl, and LNs. Plots are representative of 2 independent experiments with n = 9 per experiment. Each set of paired data points represents an individual mouse. (G) RNA flow-cytometry analysis of the expression of Nr4a1 by TCRβ + CD4 + Foxp3 + Treg cells from pooled spl and LNs. Numbers indicate average MFI ± SD. Data from 2 independent experiments with n = 2–3 per experiment. Statistical analysis was performed using unpaired Student’s t test (A), two-way ANOVA (E, p -values for effect of genotype, ** p = 0.0021) and paired Student’s t test (F, p -values for effect of each genotype, ** p = 0.0021, *** p = 0.0002, and **** p < 0.0001). Numerical values are available in . AU, arbitrary unit; BM, bone marrow; CD, cluster of differentiation; CHX, cycloheximide; CTLA-4, cytotoxic T-lymphocyte–associated protein 4; EEA1, early endosome antigen 1; FACS, fluorescence-activated cell scan; Foxp3, forkhead box protein P3; GM130, cis -Golgi matrix protein 130; LAMP2, lysosome-associated membrane protein 2; LN, lymph node; MFI, mean fluorescence intensity; miR-181, microRNA-181; Nr4a , Nuclear receptor subfamily 4 group A; Rab11, Ras-related in brain protein 11; spl, spleen; TCR, T-cell receptor; Thy, thymus; Treg cell, regulatory T cell; WT, wild type.

    Journal: PLoS Biology

    Article Title: miR-181a/b-1 controls thymic selection of Treg cells and tunes their suppressive capacity

    doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2006716

    Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) Immunofluorescence staining of Treg cells from miR-181a/b-1 +/− or miR-181a/b-1 −/− mice with antibodies against Foxp3 and CTLA-4. Right panel, quantification of integrated density for CTLA-4 fluorescence normalized to the area of each individual cell. Data are representative of 3 independent experiments with n = 3 for each genotype (pooled). Data were analyzed using ImageJ software. DAPI, nuclear staining. Scale bar, 2 μm. (B) Immunofluorescence staining of CD4 + T cells from miR-181a/b-1 +/− or miR-181a/b-1 −/− mice with antibodies against murine CTLA-4, EEA1 (upper panel) and GM130 (lower panel). Data are representative of 3 independent experiments with n = 3 (pool). Right panels show colocalization scatter plots. (C) Immunofluorescence staining of CD4 + T cells from miR-181a/b-1 +/− or miR-181a/b-1 −/− mice with antibodies against murine CTLA-4, Rab11 (upper panel) and LAMP2 (lower panel). Data are representative of 3 independent experiments with n = 3 (pool). Right panels show colocalization scatter plots. Data were analyzed using ImageJ software. DAPI, nuclear staining. Scale bar, 2 μm. (D) Enhanced degradation of CTLA-4 in the absence of miR-181a/b-1. CD4 + T cells isolated from spls and subcutaneous LNs of miR-181a/b-1 +/− or miR-181a/b-1 −/− mice were stimulated for 2 h with αCD3/αCD28 antibodies. In order to monitor protein degradation, CHX was added and incubated with cells for an additional 3 h. Each dot represents an individual cell from 10–12 randomly chosen fields of view. Quantification of integrated density for CTLA-4 fluorescence per cell was quantified using ImageJ software. (E) CD4 + CD25 + -enriched T cells were incubated in the presence of an inhibitor of lysosomal degradation, bafilomycin, for indicated time points. Accumulation of CTLA-4 was detected using FACS, and fold increase of MFI was calculated using time point 0 as reference. Data from 3 independent experiments, n = 3. (F) Cell-intrinsic up-regulation of CTLA-4 in the absence of miR-181a/b-1. Mixed BM chimeras were generated by mixing BM cells from miR-181a/b-1 +/− (CD45.1) and miR-181a/b-1 −/− (CD45.2) mice in a 1:1 ratio and injecting them into lethally irradiated WT recipients (CD45.1/2). Chimeras were analyzed 8 weeks after reconstitution for CTLA-4 expression in TCRβ + CD4 + Foxp3 + cells from the Thy, spl, and LNs. Plots are representative of 2 independent experiments with n = 9 per experiment. Each set of paired data points represents an individual mouse. (G) RNA flow-cytometry analysis of the expression of Nr4a1 by TCRβ + CD4 + Foxp3 + Treg cells from pooled spl and LNs. Numbers indicate average MFI ± SD. Data from 2 independent experiments with n = 2–3 per experiment. Statistical analysis was performed using unpaired Student’s t test (A), two-way ANOVA (E, p -values for effect of genotype, ** p = 0.0021) and paired Student’s t test (F, p -values for effect of each genotype, ** p = 0.0021, *** p = 0.0002, and **** p < 0.0001). Numerical values are available in . AU, arbitrary unit; BM, bone marrow; CD, cluster of differentiation; CHX, cycloheximide; CTLA-4, cytotoxic T-lymphocyte–associated protein 4; EEA1, early endosome antigen 1; FACS, fluorescence-activated cell scan; Foxp3, forkhead box protein P3; GM130, cis -Golgi matrix protein 130; LAMP2, lysosome-associated membrane protein 2; LN, lymph node; MFI, mean fluorescence intensity; miR-181, microRNA-181; Nr4a , Nuclear receptor subfamily 4 group A; Rab11, Ras-related in brain protein 11; spl, spleen; TCR, T-cell receptor; Thy, thymus; Treg cell, regulatory T cell; WT, wild type.

    Article Snippet: The following primary antibodies were used: purified α-mouse CTLA-4 (UC10-4F10-11, BD Biosciences) labeled with DyLight650 antibody labeling kit (Pierce, Thermo Fisher Scientific) according to the manufacturer’s protocol, AlexaFluor488-labeled rat-α-mouse Foxp3 (MF23, BD Biosciences), purified rat-α-mouse LAMP2 (Hybridoma Bank), α-mouse EEA-1 (14/EEA1, BD Biosciences), α-mouse GM130 (35/GM130, BD Biosciences), and α-mouse Rab11 (D4F5, Cell Signaling, Danvers, MA).

    Techniques: Immunofluorescence, Staining, Fluorescence, Software, Isolation, Incubation, Generated, Irradiation, Expressing, Flow Cytometry, Membrane